Workshop on Selected Topics in Computer Science
S.G.S. Institute of Technology and Science, Indore
April 5--6, 1997
Report by
P. D. Vyavahare
SGS Institute of Technology and Science
Indore.
Brief background
In October 1996 there was a discussion between Prof~P~D~Vyavhare
of S.G.S.I.T.S., Prof~N~S~Chaudhary of Department of Computer
Science, Devi Ahilya University and Dr~S~Oberoi of Tata Infotech,
on the possibility of conducting a workshop aimed at third and
final year students pursuing a Bachelor's degree in Computer
Science. The workshop was envisaged as a number of self-contained
short tutorials on topics that do not receive much attention in
the regular curriculum. It was proposed that a trial workshop of
this kind be conducted at Indore, as Prof~Vyavhare and
Prof~Chaudhary were both from Indore colleges and would be able
to make local arrangements more easily. Dr~Oberoi was to speak to
people in Mumbai who would be willing to prepare and deliver such
tutorials, as well as find out if this activity could be done
under the umbrella of IARCS. In this connection Dr~Oberoi had
talks with Prof~R~K~Shyamasundar of TIFR, Dr~M~Sohoni of IIT
Bombay, Dr~P~Bhaduri of Tata Infotech and Dr~M~Chandramouli of
IIT Bombay. This idea met with the approval of all these people,
and it was decided to go ahead and conduct a trial workshop in
Indore under the ageis of the IARCS.
Structure of the workshop and topics covered
The workshop was organized as a series of tutorial of 90 minutes
each. There were 6 such tutorials. These were:
5th April
-
Perspectives in Computer Science:
N~S~Chaudhary, Computer Science Department, Devi Ahilya
University, Indore.
-
Intranets:
A~K~Rawat, Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore.
-
Rational Approximations:
M~Sohoni, Dept of Computer Sc \& Engg, IIT Bombay.
-
Reactive Systems:
P~Bhaduri, Applied Technology Group, Tata Infotech, Mumbai.
6th April
-
Computability and Complexity:
M~Chandramouli, Dept of Mathematics, IIT Bombay.
-
A Tutorial Introduction to Types:
S~Oberoi, Applied Technology Group, Tata Infotech, Mumbai.
Copies of the slides of some talks (talk 3 and 4 on 5th April and
talk 1 and 2 on 6th April) were made available to the
organizers. A copy of the entire tutorial for talk 2 on 6th April
was also made available to the organizers.
Students were charged Rs.~25/- each to attend and faculty
members were charged Rs.~50/- each. The organization was done by
the students under the umbrella of their computer club.
Preparation
On 5th April (which was a Saturday) there were about 80-100
participants, most of which were final year students in Computer
Science and Electronics and Telecom. There were many faculty
members too. On 6th April (which was a Sunday) there were about
35-40 participants most of whom were students. There were very
few faculty members. On the whole the audience was participative
and was larger than we had generally expected. However the
response from the faculty was, in general, somewhat
disappointing. This was more that made up by the enthusiasm of
the students themselves.
Feedback Received
The first form of feedback was the student response as well as
the post tutorial discussions with the students. This feedback
was very positive, and it clearly indicates that this kind of
activity is worth the effort. Some feedback was received from
some of the faculty that was present. This also was positive.
Another, somewhat unusual, source of feedback was also
available. A dinner was hosted for the people who had conducted
the tutorials. This was hosted by the Alumni Association of
S.G.S.I.T.S., and was a small and focussed affair attended by the
Director of the Institute, HOD's of the CS and the Electronics
and Telecom department, the head of placement and some senior
local alumni. These people were keen to know in what way they
could help in the kind of activity that we had started off.
Some Concerns
A few concerns need to be addressed to make this activity more
effective than it was in our first experiment. These are:
-
We need to ensure that the activity remains students
focussed. This does not necessarily mean that it should be
organized by a student body. There should be a lot interactivity
and it would be nice to have one or may be two parallel open
sessions each day without specific agenda just to get interaction
going.
-
Copies of the tutorials as well as the slides need to be made
available to the students before the tutorials.
-
Some key faculty members need to take a strong interest and
ensure that the aims of the whole exercise are made clear to
other faculty. Some delicate political situations can interfere
with this and have a significant negative impact on the whole
activity.
-
We need more poeple to come forward and assist in this activity by
agreeing to prepare and deliver tutorials.
-
Some small level of funding is now needed. These funds will be
utilized towards 2 tier/3 tier AC rail fare for the people
delivering the tutorials, as well as generating copies of notes.
Overall Assessment
Overall the workshop could be said to have met its
objectives. The response was certainly better than had been
expected. Strong contributing factors are that the workshop was
student focussed and the enthusiasm shown by some faculty
members. The workshop could have been even more effective had it
been possible for other institutes in Indore to have
participated.
An image from the workshop:
Picture of S~Oberoi, Milind~Sohoni, P~D~Vyavahare, M~Chandramouli, P~Bhaduri